Case 2603219/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Griffin v Solvit Recruitment — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603219/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Griffin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant's unfair dismissal claim against Solvit Recruitment on the basis of a letter dated 15 December 2024 that invited representations or a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out. The tribunal identified the issue as the claimant's lack of the two-year period of qualifying service needed to bring an unfair dismissal claim, meaning the claim appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant made written representations, but the tribunal found that she had not identified any exception to the two-year rule. The judgment therefore records that the unfair dismissal claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 15 December 2024 to make representations or request a hearing. The tribunal said the claimant did not have the two-year qualifying service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim and had not identified any exception to that rule. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.