Case 2603235/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Reynolds v Mr Ronald S Contrado — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603235/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Reynolds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 6 December 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and orders payment of £14,000 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £14,000 gross. | Upheld | — | £14,000 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £12,500 damages. | Upheld | — | £12,500 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded £9,645 redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £9,645 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £3,744. | Upheld | — | £3,744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,889
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.