Case 2603244/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Sharon Marshall v Swinderby Pre School Playgroup (a registered charity 1040254) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603244/2023
- Decision date
- 10 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sharon Marshall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge N Wilson, sitting alone at Nottingham on 18 March 2024 by video, heard claims brought by Ms Sharon Marshall against Swinderby Pre School Playgroup (a registered charity, 1040254). The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Rebecca Morris.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for redundancy pay was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £6,899.68. The tribunal also found the claim for notice pay well founded and ordered payment of £2,141.28, making a total of £9,040.96 due to the claimant.
The respondent agreed to pay what it could to the claimant by 31 March 2024 and in any event to pay the full sums due by no later than 31 May 2024. The decision was explained to the parties orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claim for redundancy pay well founded. | Upheld | — | £6,900 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim was well founded; classified as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £2,141 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,041
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.