Case 2603247/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Naylor v G Seal Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603247/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Naylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issue hearing held at Nottingham via CVP on 10 May 2022 before Employment Judge Fredericks. The tribunal dealt only with the outstanding procedural issues in Mr A Naylor's claims against G Seal Limited.
The claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal also struck out the part of the unlawful deduction from wages claim that related to travelling to and from the claimant's place of work, finding that it had no reasonable prospects of success.
The remaining element of the unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. Because of those outcomes, the respondent's applications for deposit orders fell away and were not considered. The claimant's representative requested written reasons on the travel-time issue, and the judgment notes that reasons were to be promulgated separately.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The portion of the unlawful deduction from wages claim relating to travelling to and from the claimant's place of work was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The surviving element of the unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.