Case 2603253/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Kiffin v Walstead Binders — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603253/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Kiffin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. It recorded that, by letter dated 31 October 2020, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 17 September 2020 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The judgment also states that the hearing listed for 28 January 2021 would not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 17 September 2020 and had not actively pursued the case. By letter dated 31 October 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.