Case 2603266/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Brown v Noble Living (Nottingham) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603266/2023
- Decision date
- 9 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 April 2024 in Nottingham by CVP, before Employment Judge L Brown, the claimant, Miss A Brown, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The judgment records a single wages complaint arising from alleged unauthorised deductions.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period leading up to 31 October 2023 and ordered the respondent to pay £340, described as the gross sum deducted. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction in the period leading up to 31 October 2023. | Upheld | — | £340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £340
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.