Case 2603313/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Doherty v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603313/2019
- Decision date
- 31 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Doherty
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew his complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract. The breach of contract complaint was described as being in respect of a term about the respondent being an Equal Opportunities employer, and both withdrawn complaints were dismissed.
The claimant's complaint of disability discrimination was not finally determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that it shall proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint, described as concerning a term about the respondent being an Equal Opportunities employer, was dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination complaint shall proceed to hearing; no final outcome is recorded in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.