Case 2603313/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Turner-Neale v David Ryan (trading as Caliver Books) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603313/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Turner-Neale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 November 2020 Employment Judge Camp gave a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs C Turner-Neale against David Ryan trading as Caliver Books. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £261.78, that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and was due £384.42 in damages, and that accrued holiday entitlement of £544.33 remained unpaid.
The tribunal also found that, when the proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of the obligation to provide a statement of employment particulars and ordered payment of £1,536, described as four weeks' pay. The total sum payable was £2,726.53, and the hearing listed for 7 January 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £262 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £384 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £544 |
| Other | At the start of the proceedings the respondent was in breach of the obligation to provide a statement of employment particulars, and the tribunal awarded four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,536 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,727
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.