Case 2603337/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. I Beauchamp v Phoenix Aspirational Learning Support Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603337/2023
- Decision date
- 4 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. I Beauchamp
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 22 December 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,251.93. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,921.17.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £4,173.10 in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,252 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment; claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £2,921 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,173
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.