Case 2603360/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. I Mussa v AT Management Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603360/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. I Mussa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment dated 26 February 2020 in which Employment Judge Heap found for the claimant on all pleaded heads of claim against AT Management Ltd. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by not paying an attendance bonus, and ordered payment of £75.00 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £138.46. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £121.13. The sums ordered in the judgment total £334.59.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of an unpaid attendance bonus. | Upheld | — | £75 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal found to be in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded. | Upheld | — | £138 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £121 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £335
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.