Case 2603362/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Richmond v David Taylor Automedia Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603362/2019
- Decision date
- 5 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Richmond
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr B Richmond's claim against David Taylor Automedia Limited (In Administration) under rule 37. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By letter dated 5 December 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim; it records a strike out under rule 37 because the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.