Case 2603371/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Maninder Thakar v Option Finance Ltd Record of a Hearing by CVP at the Employment Tribunal — 2024
- Case reference
- 2603371/2023
- Decision date
- 1 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Maninder Thakar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a judgment by consent. It stated that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant her holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,537.56.
The judgment also stated that the remaining claims were all withdrawn and dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the record, and no legal tests or further findings were set out.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records by consent that the respondent failed to pay the claimant her holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the remaining claims are all withdrawn and dismissed, without setting out reasons. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the remaining claims are all withdrawn and dismissed, without setting out reasons. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the remaining claims are all withdrawn and dismissed, without setting out reasons. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the remaining claims are all withdrawn and dismissed, without setting out reasons. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,538
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.