Case 2603403/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P Williams v E.On UK plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603403/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not appear or present a response. The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds, but the extracted text does not identify the substantive claims or set out findings on liability beyond that default outcome.
The judgment does not determine remedy. Instead, it directs that remedy will be assessed at a later hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone on Monday 24 February 2020 at 2.00 p.m. at the Tribunal Hearing Centre in Nottingham, with a time estimate of two hours.
Because the extracted text is a universal template judgment, it does not record any legal reasoning, remedy figures, or separated awards, and it does not identify any lay members.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment states only that 'the claim succeeds' and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. The extracted text does not identify the specific cause or causes of action. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.