Case 2603408/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Arter v Total Integrated Solutions — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603408/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Arter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 October 2020, the tribunal gave Mr C Arter an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal found that he did not have the requisite length of service to pursue a claim of unfair dismissal or a redundancy payment.
The claimant did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The listed hearing on 5 February 2020 would not take place, and the respondent was not required to submit a defence.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant did not have the requisite length of service to pursue this claim, and struck it out under rule 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant did not have the requisite length of service to pursue this claim, and struck it out under rule 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.