Case 2603411/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Alliss v Tailor Contracting Ltd Slickhead Contracting Ltd Meenik Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603411/2019
- Decision date
- 11 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Alliss
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim against Tailor Contracting Ltd, Slickhead Contracting Ltd and Meenik Ltd under rule 37. By letter dated 2 January 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because she had not been employed by any of those respondents and the claim against them had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim in respect of each of the three respondents. The judgment records that the claim against Pentagon Recruitment and Selection Limited would continue to a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against Tailor Contracting Ltd, Slickhead Contracting Ltd and Meenik Ltd was struck out because the claimant had not been employed by any of them and did not make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's 2 January 2020 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.