Case 2603417/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Ritchie v D. Williams Electrical Services and Danny Williams — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603417/2019
- Decision date
- 3 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Ritchie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short withdrawal order. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant under rule 52.
No findings on liability, remedy, or compensation were made. The order therefore disposes of the case without any tribunal determination on the underlying breach of contract, sex discrimination, or unfair dismissal claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. No merits findings or separate remedy were recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. No merits findings or separate remedy were recorded. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. No merits findings or separate remedy were recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.