Case 2603439/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jones v Tuensa Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603439/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under the Rule 21 judgment procedure. Miss V Jones was the claimant and Tuensa Ltd was the respondent. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £656.80, calculated as £131.36 for five weeks.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. On that claim it awarded £1,510.64, made up of a basic award of £985.20 and a compensatory award of £525.44. The compensatory award was described as three further weeks’ loss of earnings plus a notional week’s pay in respect of the loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, but it made no separate award on that issue. The hearing listed for 18 January 2021 was cancelled after the Rule 21 judgment was issued.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded as damages for breach of contract: £131.36 x 5. | Upheld | — | £657 |
| Unfair dismissal | The award comprised a basic award of £985.20 and a compensatory award of £525.44. | Upheld | — | £1,511 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, but made no separate award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,167
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £985
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £525
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.