Case 2603452/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Salt v The Spencer Academies Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603452/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at a Judicial Mediation Hearing in Nottingham by telephone on 13 April 2021 before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone. The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed in the agreement headed Consent Order attached to the judgment.
The tribunal therefore did not determine the merits of any pleaded claim. Instead, it ordered that the proceedings were dismissed upon withdrawal on the terms set out in the consent order. No liability findings, legal tests, or monetary award are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed in a consent order and that the proceedings were dismissed upon withdrawal. The underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing metadata; the judgment itself does not list the pleaded claims individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed in a consent order and that the proceedings were dismissed upon withdrawal. The underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing metadata; the judgment itself does not list the pleaded claims individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed in a consent order and that the proceedings were dismissed upon withdrawal. The underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing metadata; the judgment itself does not list the pleaded claims individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.