Case 2603475/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Lee v Tennoc Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603475/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out both complaints: unfair dismissal because the claimant made a public interest disclosure, and detriment because the claimant made a public interest disclosure. The judgment states that by letter dated 31 December 2019 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37; the reason given was that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and the claim form did not contain sufficient information to be sensibly responded to. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment because the claimant made a public interest disclosure. Struck out under rule 37 for no reasonable prospect of success and insufficient information in the claim form. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.