Case 2603505/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Peet v The Ralph George And Dragon Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603505/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Peet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis rule 52 judgment records that Mr E Peet withdrew the claim and that the proceedings were dismissed by Employment Judge Clark on 23 March 2020. The extracted text does not contain findings on the merits of the pleaded claims.
No award or other remedy is recorded. The judgment is limited to the dismissal following withdrawal and does not set out evidence, liability reasoning, or a split between any individual heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim; the pleaded heads are not separately restated in the text. The case listing identifies breach of contract. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim; the pleaded heads are not separately restated in the text. The case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.