Case 2603517/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Penna v Ellis & Hughes — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603517/2019
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Penna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 3 March 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr A Penna an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Victoria Butler struck out the claim under rule 37 on 17 March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 37 strike-out judgment and does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.