Case 2603533/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. C Jenkins v The Montessori Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603533/2020
- Decision date
- 6 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. C Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Heap, sitting alone, heard the claim by remote hearing on 26 November 2021. The respondent did not attend and made no representations. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested.
The tribunal found that Montessori (Baby Unit) Ltd made an unauthorised deduction from Ms C Jenkins's wages and ordered payment of £3,093.00 net. It also found that Ms Jenkins was dismissed in breach of contract and ordered payment of £3,569.52 for the notice to which she was entitled on termination of employment.
The tribunal further found that the respondent did not pay Ms Jenkins for accrued but untaken annual leave on termination and ordered payment of £1,011.50 net for that complaint. It also found that Ms Jenkins was dismissed by reason of redundancy, had not been paid a redundancy payment, and ordered payment of £5,800.47. The separate sums ordered total £13,474.49.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment ordered £3,093.00 net for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,093 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment found dismissal in breach of contract and awarded £3,569.52 for notice entitlement on termination. | Upheld | — | £3,570 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment ordered £1,011.50 net for accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,012 |
| Redundancy | The judgment found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and had not been paid a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £5,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,474
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.