Case 2603551/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Storer v SS Convenience Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603551/2019
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Storer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Adkinson Date found that SS Convenience Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss J Storer’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £727 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered damages of £4,422.60. In addition, it found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,029.47.
Finally, the tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,332. The judgment records no separate basic award, compensatory award, interest or injury to feelings award, and the total of the sums ordered is £15,511.07.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the gross sum of £727. | Upheld | — | £727 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,422.60. | Upheld | — | £4,423 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,029.47. | Upheld | — | £9,029 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £1,332. | Upheld | — | £1,332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,511
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.