Case 2603552/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Phelps v SS Convenience Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603552/2019
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Phelps
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Adkinson on 23 April 2020. The tribunal found that SS Convenience Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms Phelps' wages and ordered repayment of £365.35 gross/net.
The tribunal also found that Ms Phelps was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,847.50. In a further finding, it held that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,770.88. No discrimination or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £365.35 gross/net. | Upheld | — | £365 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,847.50. | Upheld | — | £1,848 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,770.88. | Upheld | — | £2,771 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,984
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.