Case 2603574/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Prastalo v Switch Up CIC — 2020

Case reference: 2603574/2019
Decision date: 27 October 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Butler Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Prastalo

Respondent

Switch Up CIC

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By judgment dated 27 October 2020, Employment Judge Butler recorded that the claims of discrimination, detriments for making a protected disclosure, wrongful dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant, Mr J Prastalo. The text does not identify any protected characteristic for the discrimination claim(s) or set out any substantive findings on the merits of those withdrawn claims.

The judgment also states that the remaining claims would proceed to hearing. No remedy was awarded in this decision, and no compensation figures, interest, or other monetary award are recorded in the extracted text.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment refers only to 'claims of discrimination' and does not identify the protected characteristic(s). It states these claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment describes this as 'detriments for making a protected disclosure' and records that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Wrongful dismissal	The judgment states the wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states the unlawful deductions from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.