Case 2603617/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Wainwright v Morrison Utility Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603617/2019
- Decision date
- 14 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Wainwright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment stating that the claim succeeds. The judgment does not set out detailed findings of fact or separate reasoning for the individual heads of claim.
The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing. A previously listed telephone hearing was converted to an attended remedy hearing before an employment judge sitting alone, and the later final hearing was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately set out reasons or individual findings for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately set out reasons or individual findings for this claim. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately set out reasons or individual findings for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.