Case 2603630/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Pope v AS Training Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603630/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Pope
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Batten found that AS Training Services Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Ms J Pope's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,083.33 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant her expenses, which was treated as a breach of contract. It ordered the respondent to pay £326.55 as damages for that breach. The judgment records no separate awards for interest or other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,083.33 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,083 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's expenses in breach of contract and awarded £326.55 as damages. | Upheld | — | £327 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,410
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.