Case 2603639/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Coppini v Fortuna Partners Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603639/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Coppini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in Miss C Coppini v Fortuna Partners Limited. The Employment Judge recorded that the claim succeeds, but the extracted text does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim or set out any findings on liability beyond that default success outcome.
The judgment states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is assessed in the extracted text, and no split between heads of loss is recorded.
The judgment also records that the Preliminary Hearing listed for 23 March 2020 and the Final Hearing listed for 22, 24 and 25 March 2021 were postponed, and that a Notice of Hearing of Remedy was enclosed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment; the extracted text does not specify the underlying cause of action, but states that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.