Case 2603646/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Amdad Ali v Tanber Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603646/2020
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Amdad Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to engage. It found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to give the claimant notice of dismissal or pay in lieu of notice, and awarded £1,053.36 in damages for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not paid the claimant for accrued but untaken holiday and had made unauthorised deductions from his wages. It awarded £700 for holiday pay and £226 for the deductions.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded £8,532 as a statutory redundancy payment. The total amount ordered to be paid was £10,511.36.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the respondent failed in breach of contract to give notice of dismissal or pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,053 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards compensation for accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £700 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £226 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awards a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £8,532 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,511
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.