Case 2603648/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jordon Green v Adel Investments Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2603648/2020
- Decision date
- 11 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkey Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jordon Green
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant’s claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages concerning pay due on 10 April 2020 was presented out of time, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the normal limit and that it was brought within a further reasonable period for the purposes of s.23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent did not attend and was not represented at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim relating to wages due on 10 April 2020 was presented outside the time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and it was issued within such further period as was reasonable under s.23 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £736 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday and ordered payment of the gross sum unlawfully deducted, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £672 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,408
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.