Case 2603652/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Sherry v Lets Talk Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603652/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Sherry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ahmed gave a Rule 21 judgment on 17 February 2021. The tribunal found that Lets Talk Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss A Sherry’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,627.50.
The tribunal also found that Miss A Sherry had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £393.75. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of £157.50.
The judgment additionally recorded that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to award pension contributions that had been deducted but not paid into the pension fund. No separate legal test was stated in the extracted text, and the judgment was limited to the monetary orders set out above.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,628 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £394 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £158 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,179
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.