Case 2603658/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Clarke v Lets Talk Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603658/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Ahmed recorded that Lets Talk Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs J Clarke’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £4,874.13 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £481.00 in damages. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,250.60.
The judgment stated that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to award pension contributions deducted but not paid into the pension fund. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £6,605.73.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum ordered for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £4,874 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £481 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,251 |
| Other | The tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to award pension contributions deducted but not paid into the pension fund. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,606
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.