Case 2603689/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Kaur v Article-10.Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603689/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs J Kaur against Article-10.Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,956.29.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £324.40. It further found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed and awarded compensation of £324.40.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £656.80. The hearing listed for 20 April 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,956 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £324 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £324 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £657 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,262
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £324
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.