Case 2603712/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Harriman v TF & SL Textiles Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603712/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Harriman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural decision rather than a merits judgment. Employment Judge Faulkner, sitting alone in Nottingham on 9 September 2020, rejected the claim form because it had been presented with confirmation that an early conciliation exemption applied on the basis that the respondent had contacted ACAS, but the tribunal found that no such exemption applied.
The tribunal therefore did not determine the underlying employment claims on their merits. Instead, it ordered that the claim form be returned to the claimant together with a notice of rejection and information about applying for reconsideration.
The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No award of compensation or other monetary remedy was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim form was rejected because it stated that one of the early conciliation exemptions applied, namely that the respondent had contacted ACAS, but the tribunal found that no early conciliation exemption applied. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.