Case 2603721/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Murphy v Lets Talk Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603721/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Murphy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Ahmed found that Lets Talk Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss M Murphy's wages, had dismissed her in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay her holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,423.50 gross for the wages deduction, £277.50 in damages for notice, and £333.00 for holiday entitlement.
The judgment also recorded that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to award pension contributions deducted but not paid into the pension fund. No separate sum was awarded for that issue. The bottom-line monetary total recorded by the tribunal on the claims it upheld was £3,034.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,424 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £278 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £333 |
| Other | The tribunal stated that it had no jurisdiction to award pension contributions deducted but not paid into the pension fund. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,034
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.