Case 2603723/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Crabb v Richard Charles Thorpe T/A Southern & Thorpe Butchers — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603723/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Crabb
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Victoria Butler recorded that Mrs A Crabb had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Richard Charles Thorpe T/A Southern & Thorpe Butchers, to pay damages of £3,095.17 for that breach of contract claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,200. No separate findings on unfair dismissal or discrimination were recorded in the extracted judgment text, and the hearing listed for 16 March 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,095.17. | Upheld | — | £3,095 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,200. | Upheld | — | £8,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,295
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.