Case 2603727/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Blatherwick v Richard Charles Thorpe T/A Southern & Thorpe Butchers — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603727/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Blatherwick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment of the Employment Tribunal dated 25 February 2020. The tribunal recorded that Mrs S Blatherwick had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent, Richard Charles Thorpe T/A Southern & Thorpe Butchers, to pay damages of £2,428.08.
The tribunal also recorded that Mrs Blatherwick was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,906.52. The hearing listed for 16 March 2020 was cancelled. No further reasoning, findings of fact, or legal analysis were set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and damages were awarded in the stated sum. | Upheld | — | £2,428 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was found entitled to a redundancy payment in the stated sum. | Upheld | — | £5,907 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,335
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.