Case 2603751/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Maloney v Reef Hair Boutique — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603751/2020
- Decision date
- 4 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Maloney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs M Maloney against Reef Hair Boutique. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £114.94.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of £320.19 for that head of claim. The judgment is limited to those two monetary awards and does not record any other liability findings, remedy components, or reasons beyond the stated defaults.
The total award apparent from the judgment is £435.13. The hearing listed for 22 January 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £114.94. | Upheld | — | £115 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £320.19. | Upheld | — | £320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £435
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.