Case 2603754/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bright v Extreme Mist Vapes Ltd Heard: in Nottingham — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603754/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bright
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Bright, brought claims for redundancy payment and notice pay. At the hearing he withdrew the notice pay claim, which the tribunal dismissed upon withdrawal. Employment Judge Ayre sat alone and heard evidence from the claimant and from Mr Keith Bromhead for the respondent.
The tribunal found that the claimant started work for Social Smoke Ltd on 8 August 2013 and worked continuously in the shop as a part-time assistant selling e-cigarettes and e-liquids. Social Smoke Ltd stopped trading on 1 August 2017 after being threatened with litigation, and Mr Andrew Senior took over responsibility for running the shop and paying the staff until the respondent was incorporated on 21 August 2017. The business continued to trade without any break in service, with the same activities and branding changed to the respondent's name.
Applying Regulation 3(1)(a) of TUPE, the tribunal found a transfer from Social Smoke Ltd to Mr Senior on 1 August 2017 and then a further transfer to the respondent on 21 August 2017. Under section 218(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant's continuity of employment was preserved from 8 August 2013 to 31 October 2020, when his employment ended by reason of redundancy.
On that basis, the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated on seven complete years' service. His entitlement was £1,464.96, and the respondent had already paid £627.84 on the basis of three years' service. The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay the additional sum of £837.12.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to an additional statutory redundancy payment because his continuous employment dated back to 8 August 2013, not just to 21 August 2017. Paragraph 34 of the judgment summary refers to transfer dates in 2020, but paragraphs 14-16 and 27-29 set out the transfers as occurring in 2017; the extraction follows the factual findings. | Upheld | — | £837 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant said at the hearing that he did not wish to pursue notice pay. The tribunal dismissed the notice pay claim upon withdrawal and did not determine it on the merits. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £837
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Regulation 3(1)(a) TUPE 2006
- Regulation 4(1) TUPE 2006
- Regulation 4(2)(a) TUPE 2006
- s.218(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.162 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.