Case 2603771/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Batchelor v Abbeyfield Society — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603771/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short strike-out judgment. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 29 October 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out as a duplicate claim. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment also records that claim number 2603713/2020 would proceed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out this claim under rule 37 because, after a 29 October 2020 letter giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The reason given was that the claim was a duplicate claim. The judgment states that case number 2603713/2020 would proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.