Case 2603832/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Smith v Aero EV Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603832/2020
- Decision date
- 19 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Ahmed on 19 May 2021. The tribunal found that Mr J Smith had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Aero EV Solutions Limited to pay damages of £1,950.00 net.
The tribunal also struck out the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint because he did not have the two-year qualifying period of service required to bring a claim for unfair dismissal. No further remedy breakdown was set out in the judgment beyond the £1,950.00 damages award for breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,950.00 net. | Upheld | — | £1,950 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant did not have the 2-year qualifying period of service to bring such a claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,950
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.