Case 2603839/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Kerr v 1) Nationwide Care Services Limited 2) Nationwide Care Services (Nottingham) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603839/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Kerr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a closed telephone preliminary hearing before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone on 6 July 2021. The written record states that the claim against the second Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal. It also states that the Respondents' application to strike out paragraph 5 of the grounds of complaint in the ET1 succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim against the second Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal, but the extracted text does not identify the underlying cause of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal allowed the Respondents' application to strike out paragraph 5 of the ET1 grounds of complaint. The extracted text does not specify the substantive claim type in that paragraph. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.