Case 2603868/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Pickering v B Taylor and Sons Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603868/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Pickering
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Pickering, a long-serving class 2 HGV rigid driver aged 64, returned from furlough on 20 May 2020 onto the Clayton Glass contract. He said the work required him to hand offload glass, often without assistance, and that this caused back pain. The tribunal preferred his evidence to the respondent's inconsistent account and found that he had repeatedly asked Mr Alan Taylor, Mr Glenn Woodward and Mr Andy Gibb to move him off the contract, but was not removed.
The tribunal held that the respondent's refusal to take him off the contract and its failure to engage with alternative duties breached the implied term of trust and confidence. Applying the constructive dismissal principles in Western Excavating and the implied-term authorities in Malik and Morrow, it found that Mr Taylor's response on 23 July 2020, followed by the resignation effective 24 July 2020, meant Mr Pickering resigned in response to the breach and had not affirmed the contract. The respondent's argument that the dismissal was fair for some other substantial reason was rejected under s.98(4) ERA 1996 and the band of reasonable responses test.
The constructive dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,035 and a compensatory award of £7,204.49, made up of £500 for loss of statutory rights and £6,704.49 for 13 weeks' loss of earnings at a net weekly rate of £515.73. It accepted his evidence that he took about three months to find new work and had sought to mitigate his loss during the Covid-19 period.
Separately, by consent, the respondent agreed to pay £63.50 for an overnight allowance and five hours' pay on 24 July 2020, and £331.29 for three days' holiday pay outstanding on termination. The remaining holiday-pay claim, which sought the difference between holiday pay calculated on basic pay and on average hours, was held out of time; the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it and did not extend time under s.23 ERA 1996.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the respondent breached the implied term of trust and confidence by refusing to remove the claimant from the Clayton Glass contract or explore alternative duties after he reported pain from hand offloading glass. | Upheld | — | £11,239 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, after amendment during the hearing, the respondent agreed to pay £18.50 for an overnight allowance and £45 for five hours' work on 24 July 2020. | Settled | — | £64 |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the respondent agreed to pay £331.29 for three days' holiday pay outstanding on termination. The respondent also accepted that holiday pay should be calculated by reference to average weekly hours. | Settled | — | £331 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for the difference between holiday pay calculated on basic pay and on average hours was held out of time and outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. The reasons refer to ACAS contact in August 2020 and conclude that it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time; the extracted text gives 17 August 2020 in one place and 19 August 2020 in another. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,239
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,035
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,204
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI
- Morrow v Safeway Stores plc
- s.98(1), (2) and (4) ERA 1996
- band of reasonable responses
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- Bear Scotland v Fulton
- Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.