Case 2603972/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Doherty v Michael Wheat Pond And Garden Design Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603972/2020
- Decision date
- 12 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Doherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 March 2021, the tribunal gave Mr J Doherty an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that he had not complied with the tribunal order dated 17 November 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Doherty did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 15 March 2021 was vacated and did not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the underlying complaint type in the text, but the case listing for this case reference includes unfair dismissal and working time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the underlying complaint type in the text, but the case listing for this case reference includes working time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.