Case 2604006/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Baird v Travelex Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2604006/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Baird
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms Baird's claim against Travelex UK Ltd (In Administration). The judgment states that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also records that, on 18 October 2021, it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive determination on the merits and no monetary award are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.