Case 2604028/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Fitzgerald v Production Plus Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604028/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Fitzgerald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Fitzgerald brought a breach of contract claim for unpaid 2019 bonus and for expenses. The tribunal rejected the respondent's time-limit point, treating the case as a breach of contract claim within the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. It found that the 26 February 2018 email was only a proposal, but the 9 March 2018 letter set out the final bonus term, which was accepted when the claimant continued working. Applying contractual interpretation principles from Investors Compensation Scheme, the tribunal held that the term entitled him to 1% of annual turnover above £250,000, with express exclusions only for rigging, staff parties and under-priced events.
On the 2019 figures, the tribunal found total turnover of £296,458.94, including a fixed cost contribution ('FCC') of £37,499.94. It rejected the respondent's case that the FCC could be excluded under a broad discretion or that the 28 May 2019 conversation varied the contract: silence did not amount to acceptance, and continuing to work did not clearly evince agreement to a disadvantageous variation. The FCC was not an 'event' and did not fall within the under-priced-event exclusion. Excluding rigging only, qualifying turnover was £278,685.44, so the claimant met the threshold and was entitled to a 1% bonus of £2,786.85.
The separate expenses claim was dismissed. The claimant accepted there had been no agreement to reimburse travel expenses to Letchworth, he had not submitted an invoice or receipt, and he did not advance a specific figure. The tribunal therefore found no breach in relation to expenses and ordered damages of £2,786.85 only for the bonus claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to the 2019 bonus under the 9 March 2018 contractual term and awarded damages of £2,786.85. | Upheld | — | £2,787 |
| Breach of contract | The expenses claim failed because there was no agreement to reimburse the travel costs, no invoice or receipt, and no specific amount was proved. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,787
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,787
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society
- Hershaw & others v Sheffield City Council
- Felthouse v Bindley
- Nottinghamshire County Council v Abrahall & others
- Selectron Scotland Ltd v Roper
- Abu Dhabi National Tanker Company v Product Star Shipping Limited (No.2)
- Small & others v The Boots Co Plc & another
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.