Case 2604073/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Charles v Lets Talk Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604073/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Charles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Ahmed Date found that Lets Talk Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss K Charles’s wages, and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,533.30. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded £200.00 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £640.50. It also stated that it had no jurisdiction to award pension contributions that had been deducted but not paid into the pension fund.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £2,533.30 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,533 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered £200.00 in damages. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £640.50. | Upheld | — | £641 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,374
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.