Case 2604092/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Judith Richter v UPS limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2604092/2020
- Decision date
- 4 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Judith Richter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, Employment Judge Hutchinson, sitting alone, determined that Ms Judith Richter was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the period from 24 July 2019 until 4 August 2020.
The judgment did not decide the substantive merits of the listed claim. It noted that the case remained listed for a three-day hearing commencing on 25 April 2022 and that existing case management orders did not need to be adjusted. The judge also raised the possibility of judicial mediation if both parties agreed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing judgment only determined that the Claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 for the period 24 July 2019 to 4 August 2020; it did not determine the substantive disability discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.