Case 2604104/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Kaplon v Pridea 2010 Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604104/2020
- Decision date
- 5 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Kaplon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Kaplon brought a wages claim against Pridea 2010 Ltd. The case was heard remotely by CVP in Nottingham on 22 February 2021 before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £250.85.
The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons are included in the extracted decision. The record therefore captures the outcome and remedy, but not the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £250.85. No written reasons were provided in the extracted record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £251 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £251
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.