Case 2604154/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Illingworth First v The Co-operative Group Limited Second Respondent: Sion Legg Third Respondent: Blue Arrow Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604154/2020
- Decision date
- 16 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Illingworth First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a preliminary hearing on 12 July 2021 before Employment Judge Broughton. Representatives for the respondents attended and had prepared a bundle, list of issues and agenda. The claimant did not attend, had sent no documents to the tribunal, and had not provided any explanation for his non-attendance or any request for an adjournment.
The tribunal noted that a previous preliminary hearing had been held on 12 February 2021, at which the claimant also failed to attend. After that hearing, an order had been made requiring the claimant to explain his non-attendance, failing which the claim would be struck out. The claimant then emailed the tribunal on 19 February 2021 saying he had been unaware of the telephone hearing and would keep an eye on emails in future, so the claim was not struck out and was relisted.
At the 12 July 2021 hearing the tribunal confirmed that notice had been sent to the claimant's correct email address, including the address used in his February 2021 email. Tribunal staff attempted to contact him during the hearing, but the calls were not answered and went to voicemail. After 30 minutes, the hearing was terminated. The respondents also informed the tribunal that the claimant had not served a schedule of loss or exchanged documents in accordance with earlier case management directions.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not complied with orders for the preparation of the case or attended the hearing, and that he was not actively pursuing the claims. After making all practicable enquiries into the reason for his absence, Employment Judge Broughton dismissed the claim under rule 47. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the 12 July 2021 preliminary hearing and did not provide an explanation or request an adjournment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.